Early IRA Withdrawal Tax Under §72(t): Lessons from Pal and Form 5329 for US CPA Firms

An early IRA withdrawal before age 59½ is usually ordinary income on the taxable part plus a 10% additional tax under IRC §72(t)—even when the client “just moved” the money into a regular brokerage or checking account. TaxCourtBlog’s October 7, 2026 write-up of Pal v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2026-93 (Judge Lauber; docket 16983-24), shows how costly that mistake can be when a Form 1099-R with distribution code 1 goes unreported. For US CPA firms, the case is a clean checklist lesson on §72(t), Form 5329, and Schedule 2.

What Pal v. Commissioner held

According to TaxCourtBlog (David Brunk, Oct. 7, 2026), Aloke Pal—an aerospace engineer under age 59½—moved $229,857 out of his E*Trade IRA in 2021 and did not report it: $37,460 cash to a Wells Fargo checking account, $120,013 cash to an E*Trade brokerage account, and $72,384 of stock into that brokerage account. Morgan Stanley issued a Form 1099-R with distribution code 1 (early distribution, no known exception). Pal argued he did not recognize the IRA account number after the Morgan Stanley merger and that E*Trade had stolen the funds.

The Tax Court sustained the IRS Notice of Deficiency (issued August 2, 2024): an $80,292 income-tax deficiency, $22,986 of additional tax under §72(t), and a $16,058 accuracy-related penalty under §6662. Small Business Taxes & Management’s 2026 case index lists the same memorandum (T.C. Memo. 2026-93) for §§72, 6662 and 6751 issues—early distributions before 59½, failure to report income, and supervisory approval of the accuracy penalty. Memorandum decisions bind the parties; they are not cited here as binding precedent for other taxpayers.

The early withdrawal tax under §72(t)

Under 26 U.S.C. §72(t)(1), if a taxpayer receives an amount from a qualified retirement plan (as defined in §4974(c)), tax for that year is increased by 10% of the portion includible in gross income. IRS Topic no. 557 (reviewed or updated October 9, 2026) states the same rule for traditional and Roth IRAs: early distributions are generally those received before age 59½; the 10% additional tax applies only to the includible part and is in addition to regular income tax.

Moving IRA cash or stock into a taxable brokerage or checking account is a distribution, not a nontaxable trustee-to-trustee transfer or rollover. Topic 557 excepts rollovers and transfers to another IRA or qualified plan that follow the one IRA-to-IRA rollover-per-year rule—rules that do not cover parking retirement money in a personal brokerage account. Pal’s transfers fit the taxable pattern the court sustained.

Exceptions—and which ones are IRA vs. plan-only

Topic 557 lists IRA exceptions that can remove the 10% additional tax (the distribution may still be taxable as income). They include, among others: unreimbursed medical expenses above the applicable AGI floor; certain health-insurance premiums after unemployment; total and permanent disability; terminal illness; death; substantially equal periodic payments (SEPP; see Notice 2022-6); qualified higher-education expenses; up to $10,000 for a qualified first-time home purchase; an IRS levy under §6331; a qualified reservist distribution; up to $5,000 for a qualified birth or adoption; distributions to a victim of domestic abuse (Notice 2024-55); qualified disaster distributions; personal or family emergency expenses (Notice 2024-55); certain corrective distributions; and some SIMPLE/SARSEP automatic-enrollment withdrawals.

Other exceptions apply to employer plans. Topic 557 points readers to Topic no. 558 and Publication 575. Section 72(t)(2)(A)(v)’s age-55 separation-from-service exception is a classic plan-side rule—it does not rescue a pre-59½ IRA withdrawal the way a plan participant who separates after age 55 may qualify. Always match the exception to the account type before telling a client the 10% tax is off.

Form 5329, Schedule 2, and Form 1099-R code 1

Topic 557 and the Instructions for Form 5329 (2025) say the 10% additional tax is reported on Form 5329 and Schedule 2 (Form 1040). If every Form 1099-R correctly shows distribution code 1 in box 7 and the taxpayer owes the additional tax on the full amount shown, Form 5329 is not required—enter the tax on Schedule 2 and check the box indicating Form 5329 is not being filed. If an exception applies but the 1099-R code does not show it (or the code is wrong), the taxpayer must file Form 5329 with Schedule 2 to claim the exception.

That reporting fork matters for CPA review: code 1 with no exception claimed is a Schedule 2 plug; any claimed exception is a Form 5329 documentation exercise. Related Form 5329 work for missed RMDs under §4974 is a different Part of the form—see our guides on 2026 required minimum distributions and the inherited IRA 10-year rule. Year-end Roth planning that can create taxable conversions (not early-withdrawal tax when done correctly) is covered in our 2026 Roth conversion note.

Accuracy-related penalty on top of §72(t)

TaxCourtBlog reports the court also sustained the $16,058 §6662 accuracy-related penalty after the IRS showed a substantial understatement and §6751(b) supervisory approval. Forgetting a 1099-R, disputing account numbers after a custodian merger, or alleging theft without records did not establish reasonable cause in that write-up of the opinion. Firms already walking §6662 issues may cross-check our accuracy-related penalties overview; here the practical point is narrower: unreported Form 1099-R retirement income plus early-withdrawal tax can stack income tax, §72(t), and §6662 in one deficiency notice.

Preparer checklist for early IRA withdrawals

Where Tax Brew fits

Early IRA withdrawals surface in cleanup, organizer review and 1099-R matching long before anyone argues §72(t) exceptions in Tax Court. Tax Brew provides bookkeeping, cleanup and tax prep support for US CPA firms, including retirement-distribution workpapers your reviewers can rely on, with the first 20 hours free for qualifying engagements. Your firm keeps the advice and the sign-off. See our services, or email info@taxbrewglobal.com.

Sources: TaxCourtBlog (Oct. 7, 2026), Aloke Pal v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2026-93 (docket 16983-24); Small Business Taxes & Management, 2026 Tax Court case index (Pal, T.C. Memo. 2026-93); IRS Topic no. 557 (reviewed/updated Oct. 9, 2026); IRS Topic no. 558; Instructions for Form 5329 (2025); 26 U.S.C. §72(t) (Cornell LII); IRS Publication 590-B. General information, not tax or legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

What is the early IRA withdrawal tax under §72(t)?

Under 26 U.S.C. §72(t)(1) and IRS Topic no. 557 (reviewed or updated October 9, 2026), a distribution from a traditional or Roth IRA before age 59½ generally triggers a 10% additional tax on the portion includible in gross income, on top of regular income tax. Topic 557 and §72(t)(2) list exceptions (rollovers/transfers, disability, death, SEPP, medical above the AGI floor, higher education, up to $10,000 first-time home, IRS levy, up to $5,000 birth/adoption, domestic abuse, disasters, emergency expenses, and others). Moving IRA funds into a taxable brokerage or checking account is a taxable distribution, not a nontaxable transfer.

Do I need Form 5329 if Form 1099-R shows distribution code 1?

Topic 557 and the Instructions for Form 5329 (2025) say: if distribution code 1 is correctly shown in box 7 of all your Forms 1099-R and you owe the 10% additional tax on the full amount shown on each form, you do not have to file Form 5329—enter the tax on Schedule 2 (Form 1040) and check the box that you are not filing Form 5329. If you qualify for an exception but the 1099-R does not show the right exception code, you must file Form 5329 and Schedule 2 to claim it.

What did Pal v. Commissioner hold on unreported early IRA withdrawals?

As summarized by TaxCourtBlog (Oct. 7, 2026) and listed in the Small Business Taxes & Management 2026 case index, Pal v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2026-93 (Judge Lauber; docket 16983-24), sustained tax on $229,857 of 2021 E*Trade IRA distributions the taxpayer did not report (Form 1099-R code 1), plus $22,986 of §72(t) additional tax and a $16,058 §6662 accuracy-related penalty, for an $80,292 deficiency. The court rejected claims that the account number was unrecognized after a custodian merger or that the custodian stole the funds. Memorandum decisions bind the parties to that case.

KB
Keshav Bansal

Founder of Tax Brew. Chartered Accountant (CA), formerly in Record-to-Report (R2R) at Genpact, QuickBooks Online Level 1 & Level 2 certified, Intuit Bookkeeping certified.

Try us on real work

Your first 20 hours are free. See how we handle your US CPA firm or UK practice workload.

Email for a free call